Development of curtain practices in India
The curtain practice, devadasi tradition, prostitution and Sati Pratyah were important factors which played an important role in reaching women in the underdeveloped position in medieval social conditions, which were present in the form of seed in ancient times. In the Vedic period, the practice of curtain was not practiced. Women used to freely walk in public places and could interact with men. Rig Veda shows that after marriage marriage was displayed to all visitors. It was expected that he would deliver speeches in public meetings in old age. The word 'succinct' has been used for the woman, which is an indicator of the fact that there was no circulation in the society. The practice of screen in the Hindu society appears to be prevalent in the beginning of E. The earliest literary evidence of its prevalence is found in epics received 100 e. At one place in the Ramayana, it has been said that the house, The nature and difference are in vain for all women; their character is their curtain. But the talents like Kaushalya, Kaikai, Sita have not been shown anywhere in the curtain. Draupadi of Mahabharata used to come out of the assembly. Especially in the princes, special practice is seen in the practice, Where women have been recommended to wear the curtain to save publicly. Some Buddhists used to travel on covered chariots. In the plays of Bhas, there is mention of purdaprita. Sita is shown in the curtain in the image drama. In the Swapnavadvadta, the husband of the husband did not wear the veil before marriage but after marriage he likes to live in the curtain. Harsh Dev Nagand shows that after marriage, women lived in the curtain. Bhavbhuti and Magh's compositions also get information about the prevalence of the curtain. It is possible that from around the third century, the curtain system was started in the women of the society or the nobles of the society, and it was followed in the normal families of the society. Kalidas called Rajmahisis 'Hariyampashya', which proves that they did not get out of the palaces and used to live in isolation conditions. Some examples obtained in ancient literature It shows that the practice of curtain was not strictly followed in the society. Women in under-family families and farming society did not screen. The women of the working class did not live in isolation conditions, they had men, fields, pans, In the gardens and factories were often seen without any cover. The women of the upper class family also had a sense of protest against the curtain. The Vasantassena of Marichkattikamam appears to oppose the curtain. From Lalitvishtar it is known that Buddha's wife, Gopa, protested against putting his face on his face, saying that the outer shell is not needed for the wise people. A woman named Ratnaprabha in Kathasaritsagar is found to be clearly opposed to this practice in words. In Kalhana's Rajatarangini, there is no information about the practice of the practice. Tenth century Arabic writer Abujaid has said that the Indian queens were present without any curtain in the Rajya Sabha.
The broad circulation of the phenomena in Hindu society came from the influence of Muslim aggression. In Muslim society the curtain was strictly followed. The curtain is an Islamic word that came from Arabic language. It means flipping or separating. One aspect of the curtain is the trend of the burqa. Burqa is a kind of swarms that women and women of Muslim community used to keep themselves away from men's eyes at certain places. Islam is the gift of Islam in India. Hindu women also began to curtail with the influence of Islam and during the Islamic invasion. NM Jaffar has described the curtain as a religious scandal for Hindu women. While giving examples of religious texts, he has tried to explain that curtain discontinuation was considered to be condemnable in the Hindu society. In Hindu society, the curtain was compulsorily adhered to.
Before the arrival of Muslims, there was lack of curtain practice in India. Hindu women used to cover their faces only by ghunghat. But after the advent of the Muslims, the influence of their culture as a result of their culture got special force and the hard work of the Muslims in the Hindus also became harder than before. Some Muslim rulers promoted the presentation due to fundamentalist policy. So there were some women who presented this challenge. Razia Sultan was probably the first Muslim woman who, wearing a red arm, stood open in front of the public at Chandni Chowk and had demanded justice while revolting against Sultan. Later, after becoming the Sultan of Delhi, he used to sit on a royal throne with a coverless face in the masculine and used to go unkempt between the warlords. On the other hand, Sultan Firoz Shah Tughlaq had promoted the state from the state for the promotion of puradprastha. That first Sultan who had prohibited Muslim women from visiting the maharas located outside of Delhi, so the women of Amiro had stopped getting out of the dolls or the guardians. Despite being the emperor of moderate instincts, Akbar supported the phenomenon. According to Badayuni, if a young woman was found roaming in the streets and markets without a burqa or untouched, she would be sent to the brothel where she used to take prostitution profession. Nurjahan, while refusing the curtain practice, was present in the open court with his husband and ordered the rich in the presence of her husband. In Medieval India, the curtain was strictly adhered to that rich Khushroo, who had moderate views; Who had opposed it in his work called 'Layla Majnu' and mentioned its evils;
Hindus of the upper classes also strictly adhered to the curtain to maintain their blood purity. The curtain in this class is a measure of respect, in the higher society, The same will be the same for women. The king and the rich ummah used to cover their women completely and use the locked ones. The rigorous adherence of the curtains had increased so much that the sick women of the upper classes could not even see the doctor or doctor. His illness was detected by his body clothes. If a woman is not strictly adhered to the curtain, her husband would immediately divorce her. The Hindu Amir did not even embrace the methods of Muslim rulers because they were accustomed to social progress. For economic reasons, women of lower caste society did not have to live in the curtain. A large community of farming women did not wear a sheet or specially prepared curtain or burqa and was not isolated. Her hands and feet and faces were kept open. Indian farmers could not afford to spend more wives. Hands and feet were kept open and the faces were open. Indian farmers could not afford to spend more wives. Hands and feet were kept open and the faces were open. Indian farmers could not afford to spend more wives.
Before the arrival of Muslims, there was lack of curtain practice in India. Hindu women used to cover their faces only by ghunghat. But after the advent of the Muslims, the influence of their culture as a result of their culture got special force and the hard work of the Muslims in the Hindus also became harder than before. Some Muslim rulers promoted the presentation due to fundamentalist policy. So there were some women who presented this challenge. Razia Sultan was probably the first Muslim woman who, wearing a red arm, stood open in front of the public at Chandni Chowk and had demanded justice while revolting against Sultan. Later, after becoming the Sultan of Delhi, he used to sit on a royal throne with a coverless face in the masculine and used to go unkempt between the warlords. On the other hand, Sultan Firoz Shah Tughlaq had promoted the state from the state for the promotion of puradprastha. That first Sultan who had prohibited Muslim women from visiting the maharas located outside of Delhi, so the women of Amiro had stopped getting out of the dolls or the guardians. Despite being the emperor of moderate instincts, Akbar supported the phenomenon. According to Badayuni, if a young woman was found roaming in the streets and markets without a burqa or untouched, she would be sent to the brothel where she used to take prostitution profession. Nurjahan, while refusing the curtain practice, was present in the open court with his husband and ordered the rich in the presence of her husband. In Medieval India, the curtain was strictly adhered to that rich Khushroo, who had moderate views; Who had opposed it in his work called 'Layla Majnu' and mentioned its evils;
Hindus of the upper classes also strictly adhered to the curtain to maintain their blood purity. The curtain in this class is a measure of respect, in the higher society, The same will be the same for women. The king and the rich ummah used to cover their women completely and use the locked ones. The rigorous adherence of the curtains had increased so much that the sick women of the upper classes could not even see the doctor or doctor. His illness was detected by his body clothes. If a woman is not strictly adhered to the curtain, her husband would immediately divorce her. The Hindu Amir did not even embrace the methods of Muslim rulers because they were accustomed to social progress. For economic reasons, women of lower caste society did not have to live in the curtain. A large community of farming women did not wear a sheet or specially prepared curtain or burqa and was not isolated. Her hands and feet and faces were kept open. Indian farmers could not afford to spend more wives. Hands and feet were kept open and the faces were open. Indian farmers could not afford to spend more wives. Hands and feet were kept open and the faces were open. Indian farmers could not afford to spend more wives.
No comments:
Post a Comment